Ilford PanF Plus – Shooting Real Film
- New Cameras, Image Noise, and Film
- Shooting Film ?
- Film – Polapan100 Instant Black and White Slides
- Shooting Film – Kodachrome 64
- Kodak Ektachrome 100S Film
- Shooting Film – Ilford HP5 plus
- TMax 3200 – Special Request Scan
- Polaroid Type 665 PN – RIP – A Unique and Interesting Film
- Shooting Film – Pyro Clarification And Notes
- Shooting Film – Ilford Delta100 In PMK Pyro
- Shooting Film – Kodak Plus-X
- Shooting Film – Sharpening and Other Rabbit Holes
- Shooting Real Film – Kodak TMAX 100
- 80% of Everything You Read About Photography Is Complete Nonsense
- Megapixels, Image Magnification, and Why You Probably Don’t Need a New Camera
- Seven Year Old TMAX P3200
- Ilford PanF Plus – Shooting Real Film
- Shooting Film Follies 2009
- Leica M – Kids – 8 Year Old TRI-X
- Shooting Real Film – Dead Serious
- Leica M – A Camera You Can Have With You
- Real Film – Real Wedding Photographers
- Shooting Film – Efke 100
- Shooting Film – Scanning Film and Other Horrors
- Zone System Clarifications For Newbies
- Shooting Film – Kodak Plus-X and Reader Curiosity
- What Do You Think of My New Lens?
- Massive Film Development Chart – The Most Useless Thing On The Web
- Kodak – Putting Your Money Where Your Mouth Is
- New Lens – New Project Part II
- Stupid Product Idea #17 – Now For Sale (Maybe)
- Print Samples Now Available – Massive Experiment
- Kodak Ektalure Paper – Misadventures In The World Of Analog Photography
- Fake Film Edges – Why They Bother Me
- Leica Update – M9 vs M6
- Finding Inspiration – Strange
- New Acquisition – Black And White And Other Thoughts
- Misadventures In Photography – So You Think That Scewups Don’t Happen To Anyone But You?
Just another in my series of shooting real film. This time Ilford PanF Plus, developed in PMK pyro. I was playing with this for a little while to see if it could do duty as my slow, sharp, fine grained film. The brief answer is no. At the time and still to this day I think Kodak TMAX 100 blows it out of the water in every way, including aesthetics. PanF does nothing for better than TMAX (or Delta 100 for that matter) and a whole lot of things way worse.
Here is the brief rundown. Yes it is sharp and fine grained but it has so many faults with no redeeming factors. It is really slow, so slow in the shadows that it is more like using Agfa APX 25 or Kodak Panatomic X. In fact I would prefer either of those to the Pan F. Combine this characteristic with the fact that it shoulders off so fast in the highlights it is more like using an ortho film or Tech Pan and it really sucks. To explain this in english not only is it not 50 speed when trying to retain shadow detail in zone III it blocks up very easily either via exposure or development. When I say it blocks up I really mean that, it doesn’t just get denser and denser like TMAX does while retaining detail, it goes to maximum density really quick and that is all she wrote – no more detail – no more differentiation. Done, blown. TMAX 100 on the other hand will get really dense but continues to add more and more density so the detail is there even if it is hard for newbies to get detail in the highlights. Completely different.![]()
Honestly I have no idea why Ilford continues to make this stuff (I think they do). I have no idea why they made it in the 90′s when I tested it. For that matter I have no idea why Agfa and Kodak couldn’t make money with their slow films like APX 25 and Panatomic X verses this crap. At least those two had redeeming qualities. Yes I know that all really slow films act like I describe more than faster films but having a lot of experience with Panatomic X and APX 25 and the supposedly evil but actually fantastic TMAX I can say that Pan F was ridiculous and virtually useless even after taking the time to calibrate it. I would never use it for plus development – useless.
RB
About this entry
You’re currently reading “Ilford PanF Plus – Shooting Real Film,” an entry on RB Design
- Published:
- 10.09.09 / 6pm
- Category:
- Articles, General Photography
1 Comment
Jump to comment form | comments rss [?] | trackback uri [?]