Nik Color EFX Non-Review Review
After some pestering and cajoling from persistent readers and iBuddysâ„¢ about doing some Aperture related product reviews I finally will give it a whirl. I thought why not start with the hardest, Nik Color EFX Pro. It’s not hard to use, hard to understand, or hard to copy and paste a list of all of the stuff it does from another source. Heck it’s not even hard to make example images for each and every one of its filters. I guess the hard thing for me is to figure out what I can contribute that would be helpful that I have not seen at a thousand review sites, on Nik software’s own site, or a gazillion forum sites.
Briefly this is what is not here – No optimized shots that are prettified by a specific filter. No regurgitated lessons on how to use the software, and no feature comparisons or shootouts. Instead I thought I would do my best to tell you how I approach the product, what I think of it’s usefulness, and some practical tips if you decide to use it.
Of course I must include a few images here and there so I found the crappiest, most boring, yucky image I could as a starting point to illustrate some of the crazy things that Color EFX can do. Every once in a while I’ll force myself to take a walk to shoot subjects that I normally don’t shoot with lenses that I normally don’t use. I am usually not too careful and shoot a lot. I even force myself to shoot images that I know will not be any good. Maybe some more on why I do that some other time. To the point here is the base crappy image – perfect for doing some wild manipulations. ![]()
When using Color EFX the last thing you want to do is goose up an image with enhancements prior to sending into most of the filters. For the most part make sure it is neutral and relatively flat. There are a couple of exceptions for filters like vignette. The vast majority of the filters in Color EFX do massive manipulations to brightness, contrast, and color so it’s best to send it in neutral and on the flatter side. On that note one of the biggest criticisms that I have of the product is that the default settings for most of the filters are way way way over the top. If you like subtle this alone could be a big turn off for you. Once you get comfy with the product it’s not a deal breaker because you can easily save multiple presets for each filter that suit your taste and image needs.
I am not a huge fan of most of the filter sets out there, I own this one because of it’s huge range of effects, the versatility of each filter, and the high quality of output. If you are evaluating Color EFX with the 30 day trial make sure you have the time to really spend with it. Even if you used it every day for the month you may have a hard time really getting a feel for all it will do. The vast majority of the dozens of filters have a depth that is far beyond the default presets and most are useful beyond the name. An example may be the “sunshine” filter. I think it is supposed to add sunlight to an overcast scene but it has a huge range of effects. So much so that different settings don’t even look like the same filter.
Here is my boring crappy tree in the sun with the sunlight filter.
I would probably run it through for another pass of Color EFX and do a neutral grad at the bottom on this if it were for real. That brings up an intellectual limitation of Color EFX, you cannot apply multiple filters in one shot. I say intellectual limitation because rarely would I do this, I would probably keep my in-between stages along the way anyway in case I change my mind (sort of like layers, just sequential). Actually I have rarely used more than one Color EFX filter on an image. I have but while I was working on it I kept the first and second stages until I was sure that the image was where I wanted it. When you hit the save button in Color EFX there is no going back and adjusting the effect. Another good reason to use the capability to save your presets for each filter. I actually have some favorite starting points and save a working set with the same project name as my Aperture project.
Actually that is one feature of the product not really discussed much, the ability to save groups of filters together and the ability to save filter presets. If you do not use these you will be sorry, trying to remember settings while tweaking a project does not work. Heck I cannot stand this any more I have to add the neutral density grad to the sunshine.
That’s probably over the top but hey we’re having fun with a crappy image so let’s let it all hang out. Not only that but I wanted to make a point. If you start out with a flatter image for some of the more outrageous effects and you need to manipulate the contrast or levels after the fact in Aperture have no fear the image output by Color EFX is a 16 bit TIFF file so you can adjust the crap out of it after it comes back into Aperture if required. Now we are getting somewhere. I knew I shot this tree for a reason. Let’s go for something a little more surreal. That’s the direction this thing is going and I kind of like it.
How about a going exact opposite of sunshine and use the midnight filter in blue mode.
This one actually has the blur built in as well as a bunch of completely different color rendering modes and adjustment sliders. One of the things that makes Color EFX is the depth most of the effects have. One of the dangerous things is that some of the effects and settings may have so much of an effect on an image that you get sort of stuck going to the same filter or the same preset for everything but the real power is not applying the same filter to everything you shoot. It’s also not flipping through every filter with every setting on every image. What a complete waste of time. I guess it’s okay if you have nothing better to do and like playing with your computer. The real power is taking some dedicated time to experiment and develop a concept or visual idea for a project be it personal or commercial and then go shoot the exact material you need to realize the concept.
Having that visual concept of the post production treatment prior to shooting is the key to using Color EFX productively. Fooling around with some of your images and exploring visual concepts is just the start. I like where the midnight blue thing is going but let’s go back to the sunlight thing for a moment and try a more surreal color rendition using the bi-color filters and running it back through with some soft focus.
This bi-color is a cool color on the top and a warm on the bottom. Kind of interesting color but actually looks too pretty. The soft focus isn’t really helping much with the surreal thing either in fact it looks a little bit like glamour glow, the mother of all prettifying filters with tons of adjustments all of them good. Hell I have to do it, I cannot stop myself so here it is a glamour glow version with a cool glow color.
Some advice to Color EFX users and would be users. Just get the glamour glow out of the way, the first thing you do when you are playing with any image is make a glamour glow version and then forget about it. This filter is so seductive it could make a bad picture of a pile of dog crap look pretty. It’s the heroin of filters. See what I mean a picture of an old crappy tree with no leaves brown grass in the winter time looks sexy. Okay enough of that. Back to work. I sort of like the color of the bi-color filters and sort of want the not too sharp thing but a little more surreal.
How about a fake polaroid transfer. I am not a big fan of the fake old process look but the polaroid transfer filter is actually pretty good and may give me some ideas even if I choose to implement them differently in a final visual concept. This one is not over the top smeary and texture-y.
I actually like this and gives me some ideas for another project but not for the tree. My final decision for the tree was the image at the top of the post. The IR black and white. It’s actually credible for an IR simulation and like most of the filters has enough flexibility to get a lot of different looks. Any of these effects can be reproduced in strait photoshop but would take a bit of effort to reproduce. Having a big box of crayon colors available can be a big help developing a visual concept and help spur ideas for how you envision treating a particular project or subject matter. I do not advise randomly playing with bad images helter skelter as a work process and is certainly not the value of a package like Color EFX. Sure go ahead and play around with your version of a crappy old tree image to generate ideas or get a handle on what the final visual treatment of a body of work might look like but once you have a few ideas your best bet is to go shoot the images with a good idea of where they are going to end up rather than the reverse.
I got my Nik Color EFX here. As always comments and criticism are always welcome. Hopefully this was at all useful to anyone considering Color EFX. One other note is to plan ahead when purchasing Nik products. They are available for Aperture as plugins, Adobe, and Nikon Capture NX2. There is a dizzying array of ways to purchase them and it helps to know where and how you want to use them prior to pulling the trigger to get the best deal.
RB






RB,
Excellent. Where I’m still confused is the difference between the NIK products. I see from the above that a monochrome filter is available in Color EFX, and (I assume)it is a small subset of what is available in Silver EFX. Local adjustments are also available in Viveza.
My initial impression from Nik’s website was that Color EFX was a collection of “way over the top” filters for stylized images. You point out above that considerably more subtlety is available.
I may be really dense, but I’m not getting the real difference.
Michael,
You are of course correct, Color EFX has a BW conversion filter – it’s fairly generic and has only opacity control points (like the rest of Color EFX). The filter I used on the monochrome image at the top is actually the IR filter that does color and monochrome IR simulation. In addition to a BW conversion filter Color EFX has a paper toner filter as well probably best used in a two pass situation.
Silver EFX has specific film simulations, grain simulations, control points that are much more like viveza for local adjustment of contrast brightness, paper toner types that can be used in one shot. If you do a lot of BW Silver EFX is the one for you.
Color EFX control points as mentioned are opacity only and for how I use most of the filter not really useful. I can imagine how they might be especially with filters like white neutralizer and dynamic skin softener esp for a wedding shooter. Those two alone with opacity control points maybe worth the price of admission to Color EFX.
Hope that answers your question. Bottom line although Color EFX has a BW conversion that offers a couple of fine tuning controls as well as two different rendering methods it in no way compares to Silver EFX if you are serious about your monochrome conversions. Silver EFX is a bunch of film types, developer types, paper toners, and a darkroom in a box.
Hope that answers your queseiton.
RB
Oh,
One other thing – Color EFX has a film simulation filter with a bunch of presets – the presets are way over the top considering K64 and Portra 160NC are far more saturated in the default settings than Velvia ever was. But the engine itself is pretty cool as long as you bump down the saturation quite a bit it is a reasonable starting point for getting a reasonable approximation of the color and tone curve of a particular film type. I can do this myself in one of a number of tools and the only thing worth the money are the ‘accuracy’ of the presets for any given image coming in. I have neither the time or desire at this point to test this accuracy but it is fun to play with.
RB
RB,
You forgot to mention about U-points and how they can be used to selectively control filter effects on the image. This may be one of the more powerful features.
Michael,
Silver EFX is a much more in-depth b/w conversion plug-in. It has it’s own presets and presets can be loaded that others have created. It has a structure control that Color EFX does not have as well as profiles for different brands of B/W film. It has multiple toning options for those types of films as well has controls for how much of all of the above. Silver EFX is the most robust B/W conversion tool that I have found for Aperture.
Color EFX is used just like RB describes above, but the U-point technology makes it very powerful in terms of selectively applying the effects of those filters.
Viveza is a powerful plug in that accomplishes most of what I would assume people use PS for. You can select areas of the image using U-points and adjust color and lighting for those selections independently or at the same time across however many control points that you have. I use it to great effect on group photos when I have a few faces that are not the same as far as brightness is concerned. I also use it to selectively bring up certain shadow areas or to increase color saturation in selected points of my image.
To sum up, Silver EFX is a very powerful B/W conversion filter much more so than the filter in Color EFX. Color EFX is used to apply artistic effects and filters globally as RB has shown above (although some selective control is offered using U-Points). Viveza is used to select and adjust specific parts of your image for color and lighting (these groups break down into brightness, contrast, saturation, individual color levels (RGB), Hue, and Warmth.
Micheal,
Here are a couple of my stupid crappy tree shot processed in Silver EFX Pro. They are hosted on Flickr so you can examine them at full size if you want to get an idea of some of the what the product does. None of the shots have any sharpening applied as this would distort things at a local contrast level if you were viewing at 100%.
The first one is typical of what I would have done in a real darkroom for this type of subject matter orange filter TMAX100 processed N, a small amount of edge burn – burn in the grass a bit and lighten up the clouds a hair. Selenium toning.
This one is one of the presets called old glass plate:
This is another preset called Holga:
RB
RB, Jason,
The first one above appeals to my sensibilities the other two, not so much as they look like filters.
I personally am not a wedding shooter, but as RB knows my Wife & Daughter are and I edit all of my Wife’s shoots. So a good skin filter would be helpful.
For my work and theirs, some method of local control that is better than Dodge & Burn would be helpful so I guess that means I would need Viveza and Color EFX.
If I am not mistaken, even with the reduced price of Viveza that pair cost more than the whole Aperture Bundle??
So if I need both, I should go for the bundle, correct?
Micheal,
I am sort of confused with your references to first, second, last at this point but…
I would imagine that Viveza may be something useful for all of your shooting. If you do BW then Silver EFX maybe good for all of your shooting as well – if not then probably weddings, Color EFX may have some stuff that would be great for weddings (I mentioned the dynamic skin softener, and maybe more importantly the white neutralizer, it allows you to get clean white while maintaining an overall warm WB)
If you have not done the trials you may want to go that route but be prepared to give each product some real time – maybe one trial at a time.
RB
Michael,
I agree with RB. I would take my time when reviewing each plug-in, especially Silver EFX and Color EFX as the plug-ins are easy to use, but have a number of options and adjustments. If you work with weddings and do any significant B/W, Silver EFX is a must. Viveza is also necessary, if you want something more powerful than Apple Dodge and Burn.
As far as skin and softening filters go in Color EFX, I can’t comment as I have not used them, but I could see them being useful, especially for weddings and portraiture. I can say that all of Nik’s plug-ins (Color EFX, Silver EFX, Viveza, Ect) use a similar interface, and once you have become familiar with one, it’s very easy and intuitive to learn others.
Viveza and Silver EFX were my first plug-ins and I bought them separately. I was impressed with Nik’s plug-ins in general and then bought the package, still saving money over the individual prices of each plug-in that I didn’t already have. I wanted to use Color EFX to do some wilder things, and I figured that the other plug-ins would be useful (and they have) even if they only saw limited use.
Thank you both, I’m a bit slow but I get by with a little help from my friends ; ).
Sorry for the confusion. I referred to the example images in RB’s post which he identified as “the first one” “this one” and “this is another”
Thanks for taking the time,
Michael
RB/Michael,
I’ve published an online gallery of some of my favorite images here: http://gallery.me.com/vettepilot427#gallery
I would very, very much appreciate it if you would check out this gallery and send me some email comments if you have the time. My email address should be listed on the gallery.
All of the B/W images except for one were created using Silver EFX. The Trumpf 09 image was created using the “glow” filter in Color EFX and then converting the image to B/W in Silver EFX using custom settings. I’m particularly proud of this image. It was taken with a Nikon CoolPix P6000.
Email address is not displayed. Please email to vettepilot427@mac.com