<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Aperture 2 vs. Adobe Lightroom 2</title>
	<atom:link href="http://photo.rwboyer.com/2008/09/09/aperture-2-vs-adobe-lightroom-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://photo.rwboyer.com/2008/09/09/aperture-2-vs-adobe-lightroom-2/</link>
	<description>All Things Photography</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 11:43:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: RB</title>
		<link>http://photo.rwboyer.com/2008/09/09/aperture-2-vs-adobe-lightroom-2/comment-page-1/#comment-449</link>
		<dc:creator>RB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 13:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eb3fa958-0bdc-4d28-be5b-162c0b80022c#comment-449</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s been a while but here is another update on the Aperture2 vs. Lightroom2 series of comparisons. 

RB</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s been a while but here is another update on the Aperture2 vs. Lightroom2 series of comparisons. </p>
<p>RB</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rwboyer</title>
		<link>http://photo.rwboyer.com/2008/09/09/aperture-2-vs-adobe-lightroom-2/comment-page-1/#comment-37</link>
		<dc:creator>rwboyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 01:50:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eb3fa958-0bdc-4d28-be5b-162c0b80022c#comment-37</guid>
		<description>Otis,

Thanks for the feedback, I try to present balanced information here. I see that you didn&#039;t take a look at any other information on the site. You may want to check out the PDF guide to Aperture organization if you have a minute. Aperture falls into that category in my opinion of - hard to learn - easy to use. It does not force you into a predefined way of doing your work, it provides a set of tools that if you don&#039;t understand exactly how they interact you may end up with a big mess. I do mention this in some other articles.

If you are using stacking without making a lot of use of albums I can see how you feel the way you do. I assume you are talking about albums when you mention &quot;galleries&quot;. I hope your biggest issue is not that Apple chose to use a visual indicator of blue vs. yellow folders for folders that contain projects and objects vs. folders inside of projects. Don&#039;t get me wrong I have my top ten list of things that need improvement but they are far different than yours would be. Maybe I will publish a short article on the things I really really think most heavy duty users of Aperture need.

If you have a couple of minutes I would love to hear how you are using Aperture in your workflow &quot;every day&quot; and where you are getting hung up. IMHO the compare tools alone are worth the price of admission, the ability to arbitrarily group and order images in as many ways as I want to  without having a ton of duplicate or near duplicate files all over my drives is gravy. I can honestly say that I am at least 10x more productive with Aperture than before it existed.

RB</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Otis,</p>
<p>Thanks for the feedback, I try to present balanced information here. I see that you didn&#8217;t take a look at any other information on the site. You may want to check out the PDF guide to Aperture organization if you have a minute. Aperture falls into that category in my opinion of &#8211; hard to learn &#8211; easy to use. It does not force you into a predefined way of doing your work, it provides a set of tools that if you don&#8217;t understand exactly how they interact you may end up with a big mess. I do mention this in some other articles.</p>
<p>If you are using stacking without making a lot of use of albums I can see how you feel the way you do. I assume you are talking about albums when you mention &#8220;galleries&#8221;. I hope your biggest issue is not that Apple chose to use a visual indicator of blue vs. yellow folders for folders that contain projects and objects vs. folders inside of projects. Don&#8217;t get me wrong I have my top ten list of things that need improvement but they are far different than yours would be. Maybe I will publish a short article on the things I really really think most heavy duty users of Aperture need.</p>
<p>If you have a couple of minutes I would love to hear how you are using Aperture in your workflow &#8220;every day&#8221; and where you are getting hung up. IMHO the compare tools alone are worth the price of admission, the ability to arbitrarily group and order images in as many ways as I want to  without having a ton of duplicate or near duplicate files all over my drives is gravy. I can honestly say that I am at least 10x more productive with Aperture than before it existed.</p>
<p>RB</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: otis fuentes</title>
		<link>http://photo.rwboyer.com/2008/09/09/aperture-2-vs-adobe-lightroom-2/comment-page-1/#comment-31</link>
		<dc:creator>otis fuentes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 17:03:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eb3fa958-0bdc-4d28-be5b-162c0b80022c#comment-31</guid>
		<description>Good article, RW, but I beg to differ with several of your conclusions.

Mostly in the matter of &quot;stacks,stack mode, compare mode...&quot; etc. I find Aperture&#039;s organization tools completely anti-intuitive and well, a mess. Different colored folders can only go certain places, Aperture randomly hides things in &quot;stacks&quot;, and the concept of &quot;galleries&quot; (supposedly based on iTunes playlists) is maddeningly inconsistent (ie sometimes you can delete things, others you can&#039;t, others still it deletes the item AND another item...).

It&#039;s truly bizarre, especially for this long time Mac using photographer, but Aperture makes it extremely difficult to keep track of or organize your photos. The ugly, hard to read, and non-customizable interface just add insult to injury. I use Aperture every day; as you point out, there&#039;s nothing else out there that will do what it does. Much like Democracy, Aperture sucks, just not as bad as the other DAMs out there. Failing to point out its formidable flaws (even in v 2.x, Ap still feels very beta, not quite finished) does nobody any favors.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good article, RW, but I beg to differ with several of your conclusions.</p>
<p>Mostly in the matter of &#8220;stacks,stack mode, compare mode&#8230;&#8221; etc. I find Aperture&#8217;s organization tools completely anti-intuitive and well, a mess. Different colored folders can only go certain places, Aperture randomly hides things in &#8220;stacks&#8221;, and the concept of &#8220;galleries&#8221; (supposedly based on iTunes playlists) is maddeningly inconsistent (ie sometimes you can delete things, others you can&#8217;t, others still it deletes the item AND another item&#8230;).</p>
<p>It&#8217;s truly bizarre, especially for this long time Mac using photographer, but Aperture makes it extremely difficult to keep track of or organize your photos. The ugly, hard to read, and non-customizable interface just add insult to injury. I use Aperture every day; as you point out, there&#8217;s nothing else out there that will do what it does. Much like Democracy, Aperture sucks, just not as bad as the other DAMs out there. Failing to point out its formidable flaws (even in v 2.x, Ap still feels very beta, not quite finished) does nobody any favors.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rwboyer</title>
		<link>http://photo.rwboyer.com/2008/09/09/aperture-2-vs-adobe-lightroom-2/comment-page-1/#comment-26</link>
		<dc:creator>rwboyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 03:05:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eb3fa958-0bdc-4d28-be5b-162c0b80022c#comment-26</guid>
		<description>I have received about 1,000 emails to expand on this brief bottom line article regarding the specifics so I guess I will go ahead and start to post a series of more detailed comparisons. Spending about 5 minutes thinking about this today, I am going to take the approach of dividing it up into discrete functionality groups as much as possible. I will start with file handling and file management. Keep a look out if you are interested.

RB</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have received about 1,000 emails to expand on this brief bottom line article regarding the specifics so I guess I will go ahead and start to post a series of more detailed comparisons. Spending about 5 minutes thinking about this today, I am going to take the approach of dividing it up into discrete functionality groups as much as possible. I will start with file handling and file management. Keep a look out if you are interested.</p>
<p>RB</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rwboyer</title>
		<link>http://photo.rwboyer.com/2008/09/09/aperture-2-vs-adobe-lightroom-2/comment-page-1/#comment-18</link>
		<dc:creator>rwboyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Sep 2008 20:37:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eb3fa958-0bdc-4d28-be5b-162c0b80022c#comment-18</guid>
		<description>Glad you found the article useful. You may want to check out the PDF guide on Aperture organization that is on the downloads page. On another note I have received a lot of  requests to do some head to head comparisons on the specific strengths that I mentioned. I do plan to put some of these up as soon as I have a bit of time so check back if you are still interested.

RB</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Glad you found the article useful. You may want to check out the PDF guide on Aperture organization that is on the downloads page. On another note I have received a lot of  requests to do some head to head comparisons on the specific strengths that I mentioned. I do plan to put some of these up as soon as I have a bit of time so check back if you are still interested.</p>
<p>RB</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kelly</title>
		<link>http://photo.rwboyer.com/2008/09/09/aperture-2-vs-adobe-lightroom-2/comment-page-1/#comment-17</link>
		<dc:creator>Kelly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Sep 2008 19:03:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eb3fa958-0bdc-4d28-be5b-162c0b80022c#comment-17</guid>
		<description>Very informative article.  I am a brand new Mac user and amateur photographer. I used ACDSee on my Windows computer and loved it and am searching for information on the Mac application that will best suit my needs.  Your Web site -- particularly with the Tags feature -- is pointing me in a good direction for finding this information.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very informative article.  I am a brand new Mac user and amateur photographer. I used ACDSee on my Windows computer and loved it and am searching for information on the Mac application that will best suit my needs.  Your Web site &#8212; particularly with the Tags feature &#8212; is pointing me in a good direction for finding this information.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->